Lord's Prayer, the most popular prayer among Christians, with every denomination (Catholic, Protestant, Pentecostal, Orthodox, Anglican, and so on). For most Christians, the prayer "Our Father" has become rote, so it can easily be pronounced without reading. How popular and important LORD'S PRAYER, then in 1875 in Jerusalem (where Jesus taught the "Lord's Prayer" and prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem), built a church with the name "Pater Noster", which all the walls are adorned with the Lord's Prayer in various languages of the world. In the Church "Pater Noster" is, the pilgrims seemed to hear again the Lord Jesus taught the "Lord's Prayer".
In the Bible, there are two versions of "The Lord's Prayer", the version of Matthew's Gospel (cf. Mt 6:9-13) and the Gospel of Luke (cf. Lk 11:2-4). The Lord's Prayer Matthew version slightly longer than the Lord's Prayer Luke's version.
Next: Description privilege of the Lord's Prayer from the two existing versions. Starting from Matthew.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Jesus, the Light of the Nations
In light of expectation of the coming Messiah (a Greek / Latin: Messiah, Savior), the Lord will send his Messiah as the "light of nations". The term "nations" in Hebrew refers to nations other than Israel.
Therefore the word of Jesus Christ that anyone who follows him "do not walk in darkness, but will earn the Light of Life)", are carefully fulfilled the prophecy of the prophet Isaiah 8: 23-9:1 that in the original reads: "... derek hayyam, 'aver hayyarden Gelil haggoyim. Ha' am haholekim behoshek ra'u 'or gadol, yosyevi be arets tsalmavet' or negah aleikhem"(... road to the sea, the region across the Jordan, Galilee: the territory of other nations. The nation who walk in darkness, have seen a great light, those who dwell in the land of thick darkness, the light has shone upon it).
So, 'Isa al-Masih is the Light of the world, that enlightens every person who walked in darkness so that they acquire the Light of Life. And since the coming of the Messiah, the walls of Jewish exclusivism, destroyed. Jesus is not only sent to the Children of Israel, but He became the Saviour of the World. Like a light that never restrict His light, shining in the courtyard of the kings or in the gutter trash.
Nations once considered low, a people who regarded the religious laity, all visited by His light brightly lit. Knows no distinction, no discrimination.
In Jewish terminology, the term "ha'am haholekim beheshek" (the nations who walked in darkness) and "arets tsalmavet" (domestic gloom or literally: "the country is overshadowed by the death"), meaning roughly close to the Arabic term "jahiliah" (ignorance). While the term 'goyim' (Gentiles, "non-Jewish") also contains the meaning of "heathen nations" who do not know God, who is worshiped by the people of Israel. So, its connotation is very humbling. Not only the religions of non-Jews, but also other nations.
Expectation of the Jews themselves, also called the Messiah who would come as "Light of the Gentiles"('or hagoyim). Jesus was more explicit expression again: Ani 'or ha' olam (I am the Light of the World). The interpretation of Jewish rabbis, 'or (light) is always associated with a conversation about the coming Messiah. For example, in Isaiah 49:6 God said to the Messiah, called the Servant of Yahweh ('Ebed Yahweh): "I will also give thee for a light of the nations, that My salvation may be unto the end of the earth." (Compare also: Isaiah 60:1 and Daniel 2:22).
It should be noted, statements of Jesus as the Light of the World is also fulfilled the prophecy of the prophet Zechariah (Zech. 14:16-20) that His glory will be revealed in Jerusalem at the Feast of Tabernacles. Interpretations of pre-Christian Jews, especially those written in the Targums, also connects this verse with the glory of the coming Messiah.
Therefore the word of Jesus Christ that anyone who follows him "do not walk in darkness, but will earn the Light of Life)", are carefully fulfilled the prophecy of the prophet Isaiah 8: 23-9:1 that in the original reads: "... derek hayyam, 'aver hayyarden Gelil haggoyim. Ha' am haholekim behoshek ra'u 'or gadol, yosyevi be arets tsalmavet' or negah aleikhem"(... road to the sea, the region across the Jordan, Galilee: the territory of other nations. The nation who walk in darkness, have seen a great light, those who dwell in the land of thick darkness, the light has shone upon it).
So, 'Isa al-Masih is the Light of the world, that enlightens every person who walked in darkness so that they acquire the Light of Life. And since the coming of the Messiah, the walls of Jewish exclusivism, destroyed. Jesus is not only sent to the Children of Israel, but He became the Saviour of the World. Like a light that never restrict His light, shining in the courtyard of the kings or in the gutter trash.
Nations once considered low, a people who regarded the religious laity, all visited by His light brightly lit. Knows no distinction, no discrimination.
In Jewish terminology, the term "ha'am haholekim beheshek" (the nations who walked in darkness) and "arets tsalmavet" (domestic gloom or literally: "the country is overshadowed by the death"), meaning roughly close to the Arabic term "jahiliah" (ignorance). While the term 'goyim' (Gentiles, "non-Jewish") also contains the meaning of "heathen nations" who do not know God, who is worshiped by the people of Israel. So, its connotation is very humbling. Not only the religions of non-Jews, but also other nations.
Expectation of the Jews themselves, also called the Messiah who would come as "Light of the Gentiles"('or hagoyim). Jesus was more explicit expression again: Ani 'or ha' olam (I am the Light of the World). The interpretation of Jewish rabbis, 'or (light) is always associated with a conversation about the coming Messiah. For example, in Isaiah 49:6 God said to the Messiah, called the Servant of Yahweh ('Ebed Yahweh): "I will also give thee for a light of the nations, that My salvation may be unto the end of the earth." (Compare also: Isaiah 60:1 and Daniel 2:22).
It should be noted, statements of Jesus as the Light of the World is also fulfilled the prophecy of the prophet Zechariah (Zech. 14:16-20) that His glory will be revealed in Jerusalem at the Feast of Tabernacles. Interpretations of pre-Christian Jews, especially those written in the Targums, also connects this verse with the glory of the coming Messiah.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Minorities in the era of democracy.
As was predicted earlier, the emergence of democratization in the Middle East region is difficult dammed or discontinued. In turn, one after the other Arab countries affected by outbreaks of Arab Spring. With the exception of the Libyan, another part of the fall of Arab rulers is the insistence of his own people with little indirect intervention of Western countries. Zine El Abidin Ben Ali, Hosni Mubarak, could not maintain his power. Ali Abdullah Saleh and Bashar Assad is facing severe pressure from the opposition who want them back. Moamar Khaddafi, was not overthrown by his own people but by the Western leaders who thirst of Libyan oil.
And also been predicted earlier, the process of democratization occurring in countries with Muslim majority also have a direct impact on the survival of the adherents of minority religions. What we see in Egypt today, where the Coptic people are fighting for their rights as fellow citizens of Egypt. Sectarian and religious conflicts like this are happening everywhere, because the decline of the powerful Arab rulers. The absence of a strong ruler who directly impact the loss of protection to minorities.
Of the countries that have a Muslim majority, Indonesia is a country that is relatively more free in expressing an opinion and religious expression. But the country also suffered a setback in terms of religious tolerance after the fall of the Suharto regime in 1998. Banning the establishment of houses of worship of minorities seems to be a common thing happening in western Indonesia. As was the case today is busy talking on the GKI Yasmin Bogor, West Java. Church building is sealed by the local government, arguing there was no building permit. Though Indonesia's Supreme Court has ruled that local governments have no right to seal the building of the church because the church GKI Yasmin already have an official building permits. Things like this continue to take place in many places in western Indonesia. So what is happening in Egypt against the Copts are the same thing that has been perceived first by the minorities in Indonesia.
May the Coptic people, can get their rights as full citizens of Egypt, not as second-class citizens. Greetings and prayers are always for the people of Copts, who have been able to survive in the faith for centuries in oppression.
And also been predicted earlier, the process of democratization occurring in countries with Muslim majority also have a direct impact on the survival of the adherents of minority religions. What we see in Egypt today, where the Coptic people are fighting for their rights as fellow citizens of Egypt. Sectarian and religious conflicts like this are happening everywhere, because the decline of the powerful Arab rulers. The absence of a strong ruler who directly impact the loss of protection to minorities.
Of the countries that have a Muslim majority, Indonesia is a country that is relatively more free in expressing an opinion and religious expression. But the country also suffered a setback in terms of religious tolerance after the fall of the Suharto regime in 1998. Banning the establishment of houses of worship of minorities seems to be a common thing happening in western Indonesia. As was the case today is busy talking on the GKI Yasmin Bogor, West Java. Church building is sealed by the local government, arguing there was no building permit. Though Indonesia's Supreme Court has ruled that local governments have no right to seal the building of the church because the church GKI Yasmin already have an official building permits. Things like this continue to take place in many places in western Indonesia. So what is happening in Egypt against the Copts are the same thing that has been perceived first by the minorities in Indonesia.
May the Coptic people, can get their rights as full citizens of Egypt, not as second-class citizens. Greetings and prayers are always for the people of Copts, who have been able to survive in the faith for centuries in oppression.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Dokein (2)
The theory of the substitution of 'Isa with others (Simon of Cyrene, Judas Iscariot), does not satisfy some interpreters of Islam, because not in accordance with the principles of God's justice. In addition, if grammatically traced, it’s also not suitable.
The reason given is that if a person's place of Jesus, should use the third singular pronoun self. Lakin shubiha lahu (but disguised for him) not Lakin shubiha lahum (but disguised for them). Another reason is the verse does not explain who his successor. There is no evidence from the Qur'an and the Hadith which says that people named Yahudza (Judas Iscariot) as a person whose face has been altered so that later replaced Jesus Christ on the cross. Only a book called the Gospel of Barnabas, a fictional tale of Muslims, in medieval times, which clearly write the name Yahudza as a person who was likened to Jesus. This book by some Muslims who are not educated regarded as the only true gospel that still exist, although this book contains a lot of things that do not fit well with the verses of the Koran, such as taking the title Christ for Jesus and pinned on Mohammed . Whereas the Arab prophet was never claimed that title and is very respectful of that title for Jesus, because in Islam, al-Masih's degree does not mean the same as the Messiah in Jewish theology.
Ishaq ibn Bishr in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, express opinions that are very close to the Christian view: "God made him die for three days, then turned back and was appointed to his side."
When viewed Qs an-Nisa 157, "... but they killed him not, nor crucified him, ..." then what is said in the verse there is conformity with the Gospel facts, namely that the Jews did not kill Jesus or crucify him. This is because the data concerning the gospel of Jesus' crucifixion, with clearly stated even though the Jews who demanded the punishment of Jesus, but who carry out the execution of Jesus was still a Roman soldier.
The reason given is that if a person's place of Jesus, should use the third singular pronoun self. Lakin shubiha lahu (but disguised for him) not Lakin shubiha lahum (but disguised for them). Another reason is the verse does not explain who his successor. There is no evidence from the Qur'an and the Hadith which says that people named Yahudza (Judas Iscariot) as a person whose face has been altered so that later replaced Jesus Christ on the cross. Only a book called the Gospel of Barnabas, a fictional tale of Muslims, in medieval times, which clearly write the name Yahudza as a person who was likened to Jesus. This book by some Muslims who are not educated regarded as the only true gospel that still exist, although this book contains a lot of things that do not fit well with the verses of the Koran, such as taking the title Christ for Jesus and pinned on Mohammed . Whereas the Arab prophet was never claimed that title and is very respectful of that title for Jesus, because in Islam, al-Masih's degree does not mean the same as the Messiah in Jewish theology.
Ishaq ibn Bishr in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, express opinions that are very close to the Christian view: "God made him die for three days, then turned back and was appointed to his side."
When viewed Qs an-Nisa 157, "... but they killed him not, nor crucified him, ..." then what is said in the verse there is conformity with the Gospel facts, namely that the Jews did not kill Jesus or crucify him. This is because the data concerning the gospel of Jesus' crucifixion, with clearly stated even though the Jews who demanded the punishment of Jesus, but who carry out the execution of Jesus was still a Roman soldier.
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Dokein (apparently)
In the early days of Christianity, there are groups of gnostic sects, who do not believe in the crucifixion of Christ. The reason they put it is not based on historical fact but based on sectarian ideas of their own. According to them, the body is bad, it's just a good spirit. If Christ is the logos, then he may not really be human, because it is impossible Logos that is the spirit, in contact with physical objects. So when Jesus seems to be crucified, then it just seems to be, not really crucified. The truth, Jesus actually laugh at the people who crucified him. Therefore, the teachings of this sectarian cult called "docetism" (from the word δοκέω dokeō, "to seem").
At the time later, Islam emerged, with the doctrine that rejected the crucifixion of Isa al-Masih. This doctrine is based on Surah 4 (An-Nisa) verse 157, "And Because Of Their saying (in Boast)," We killed Messiah 'Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah, "-but They killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of 'Isa was put over another man (and They killed That man), ... ". Most Muslims interpret this verse by saying that Jesus was not crucified, but replaced with others who likened such as 'Jesus by God, while' God raised Jesus to heaven itself. Opinions like these are teachings which are believed by most Muslims even though there are Muslim leaders who disagree with the doctrine of rejection of the crucifixion 'Isa.
Some Muslim thinkers argue that Jesus was crucified, but only just fainted, and when sober fled to Qumran, living with his mother (Mary) with the Essene sect and died in that place. Ahmadiyya scholars also said the same thing, that Jesus was crucified and collapsed, but after realized he fled to Kashmir, India, where the grave of 'Isa is still there today. It seems Muslim thinkers, and Ahmadiyyah scholars, acknowledging the crucifixion of Isa based verses in the Qur'an: “And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, … (Qs Maryam 33), “And (remember) when Allah said: “O ‘Isa (Jesus) I will take you …(”Ya ‘Isa innee mutawaffeeka”)” (Qs Ali Imran 55), “… but when You took me up, You are the Watcher over them, …” (Qs al-Maidah 117). If viewed literally the verses indicate that Jesus would die, so they can receive the death 'of Jesus by crucifixion as recorded in the Gospels and the Jewish and Roman history. While scholars who do not believe typically use Surah an-Nisa 157 above, "... but They killed him not, nor crucified him, ...". This group recognizes that 'Isa raised to heaven, on the basis of the verses: “But Allah raised him [‘Isa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself, …” (Qs an-Nisa 158), “And (remember) when Allah said: “O ‘Isa (Jesus) I will take you and raise you to Myself …” (Qs Ali Imran 55). But Qs Maryam verse 33, it embraces both, stating after 'Isa died and then resurrected back to life, “And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!”
At the time later, Islam emerged, with the doctrine that rejected the crucifixion of Isa al-Masih. This doctrine is based on Surah 4 (An-Nisa) verse 157, "And Because Of Their saying (in Boast)," We killed Messiah 'Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah, "-but They killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of 'Isa was put over another man (and They killed That man), ... ". Most Muslims interpret this verse by saying that Jesus was not crucified, but replaced with others who likened such as 'Jesus by God, while' God raised Jesus to heaven itself. Opinions like these are teachings which are believed by most Muslims even though there are Muslim leaders who disagree with the doctrine of rejection of the crucifixion 'Isa.
Some Muslim thinkers argue that Jesus was crucified, but only just fainted, and when sober fled to Qumran, living with his mother (Mary) with the Essene sect and died in that place. Ahmadiyya scholars also said the same thing, that Jesus was crucified and collapsed, but after realized he fled to Kashmir, India, where the grave of 'Isa is still there today. It seems Muslim thinkers, and Ahmadiyyah scholars, acknowledging the crucifixion of Isa based verses in the Qur'an: “And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, … (Qs Maryam 33), “And (remember) when Allah said: “O ‘Isa (Jesus) I will take you …(”Ya ‘Isa innee mutawaffeeka”)” (Qs Ali Imran 55), “… but when You took me up, You are the Watcher over them, …” (Qs al-Maidah 117). If viewed literally the verses indicate that Jesus would die, so they can receive the death 'of Jesus by crucifixion as recorded in the Gospels and the Jewish and Roman history. While scholars who do not believe typically use Surah an-Nisa 157 above, "... but They killed him not, nor crucified him, ...". This group recognizes that 'Isa raised to heaven, on the basis of the verses: “But Allah raised him [‘Isa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself, …” (Qs an-Nisa 158), “And (remember) when Allah said: “O ‘Isa (Jesus) I will take you and raise you to Myself …” (Qs Ali Imran 55). But Qs Maryam verse 33, it embraces both, stating after 'Isa died and then resurrected back to life, “And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!”
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Jesus in Islamic eschatology
Al-Quran, the Muslim holy book, contains the revelations of God to Muhammad. But besides that, the Qur'an also mention a lot about Jesus. The Qur'an mentions the miraculous birth of Jesus (Sura 3 verse 42-47), about the miracles of Jesus (Sura 3 verse 49), about his work as a messenger of Allah. But at the same time, the Qur'an also narrowed the scope of the ministry of Jesus: He was sent only to the Children of Israel only, not for all humanity (Sura 3 verse 48-49).
We can see about it that the Qur'an sees Jesus in two patterns, positive and negative. On the one hand, the Qur'an had great respect for Jesus to call Him in a few names: Kalimatullah (Sura 4 verse 171), the Spirit of God (Sura 19 verse 17, Sura 21 verse 91), and several other names, which suggests a form of homage to Jesus. On the other hand, the Qur'an rejected Jesus in some respects that it is fundamental to the Christian faith, such as: He is the Son of God, Jesus' death on the cross. The identity of Jesus became a big question mark in the Qur'an. If at first glance, Jesus seems to be glorified among the other prophets by some an honorary degree, the miracle of birth and the miracles he did, but if it is seen more in depth, then all the honors for Jesus as Messiah, God's Word, the Spirit of God has no function as the meaning of these titles. The titles are pinned on Jesus merely honorary title only, honoris causa. Similarly with the miraculous birth and his miracles nor is it something special in the Qur'an. The Qur'an denies that Jesus was born without a father, more special than the other prophets because if Jesus was the only without a father to be special, how about Adam, who was born without a father and mother, Adam's definitely more special than Jesus. Likewise, the miracles of Jesus, not Moses also perform miracles greater than Jesus, that is by splitting the sea?
In Islamic eschatology, the role of Jesus does not stand out when compared with the role of Muhammad himself. Jesus is mentioned as a figure who will come again before the Day of Judgement and kill the Dajjal, but Jesus comes again will only confirm the teachings of Muhammad, to destroy the cross, kill swine, and so on. Jesus would also have a wife and son, reigned for 40 years, then died and was buried in Medina, near the tomb of Muhammad. The role of Jesus in Islamic eschatology is very small even none at all, because he can not provide intercession to save people from punishment (punishment of hell fire), even Jesus himself was tried and examined by God, to account for the deeds of his flock, which has deify Him and His Mother (Sura 5 verse 116.117).
We can see about it that the Qur'an sees Jesus in two patterns, positive and negative. On the one hand, the Qur'an had great respect for Jesus to call Him in a few names: Kalimatullah (Sura 4 verse 171), the Spirit of God (Sura 19 verse 17, Sura 21 verse 91), and several other names, which suggests a form of homage to Jesus. On the other hand, the Qur'an rejected Jesus in some respects that it is fundamental to the Christian faith, such as: He is the Son of God, Jesus' death on the cross. The identity of Jesus became a big question mark in the Qur'an. If at first glance, Jesus seems to be glorified among the other prophets by some an honorary degree, the miracle of birth and the miracles he did, but if it is seen more in depth, then all the honors for Jesus as Messiah, God's Word, the Spirit of God has no function as the meaning of these titles. The titles are pinned on Jesus merely honorary title only, honoris causa. Similarly with the miraculous birth and his miracles nor is it something special in the Qur'an. The Qur'an denies that Jesus was born without a father, more special than the other prophets because if Jesus was the only without a father to be special, how about Adam, who was born without a father and mother, Adam's definitely more special than Jesus. Likewise, the miracles of Jesus, not Moses also perform miracles greater than Jesus, that is by splitting the sea?
In Islamic eschatology, the role of Jesus does not stand out when compared with the role of Muhammad himself. Jesus is mentioned as a figure who will come again before the Day of Judgement and kill the Dajjal, but Jesus comes again will only confirm the teachings of Muhammad, to destroy the cross, kill swine, and so on. Jesus would also have a wife and son, reigned for 40 years, then died and was buried in Medina, near the tomb of Muhammad. The role of Jesus in Islamic eschatology is very small even none at all, because he can not provide intercession to save people from punishment (punishment of hell fire), even Jesus himself was tried and examined by God, to account for the deeds of his flock, which has deify Him and His Mother (Sura 5 verse 116.117).
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Eschatology in the New Testament
In the New Testament eschatology, Jesus had a very important and prominent. Jesus is not just one sign of the coming end of time (as understood by Muslims), but by and in him that the end times happen. Talk of NT eschatology in general is associated with the second coming of Jesus, commonly called the parousia.
Excessive emphasis on the events of Jesus' second coming times, often bringing Christians to a tendency to count and determine when exactly the incident. From the very beginning there are some groups of Christians who try to give the exact date on the day of the second coming of Jesus. Early example of this trend is Montanism movement in Asia Minor, in the second century. Montanus, with two of his female followers: Priscilla and Maximilla, stating that the Holy Spirit promised by Jesus has come in them. To assure this, they began to speak in tongues, even ecstasy. This movement demanded that his followers do the holy life, abstain from worldly pleasures, for Jesus' second coming is near.
In subsequent periods, groups emerged, which emphasizes Jesus' parousia to extremes, such as the Adventist group. The founder of this sect, namely William Miller predicted the second coming of Jesus will occur in 1843, after researching the Book of Daniel and Revelation. What happened was the disappointment of his followers because there is no any event in that year. Similarly, in groups of Pentecost, the tendency to match the events that occurred in the present with biblical prophecy about Jesus' parousia, as practiced by Gordon Lindsay. There are other groups similar, also do the same thing that is predicted the coming of Jesus' second coming, as recently happened.
Human efforts to calculate exactly when Jesus returns the second time, in any form will also end in failure, because contrary to the mandate of the Bible itself, αυτοι γαρ ακριβως οιδατε οτι η ημερα κυριου ως κλεπτης εν νυκτι ουτως ερχεται for you yourselves know very well that the Day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. (1 Thessalonians 5:2) περι δε της ημερας εκεινης και ωρας ουδεις οιδεν ουδε οι αγγελοι των ουρανων ουδε ο υιος ει μη ο πατηρ μονος "No one knows when that day or hour will come-not the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." (Mat 24:36)
Excessive emphasis on the events of Jesus' second coming times, often bringing Christians to a tendency to count and determine when exactly the incident. From the very beginning there are some groups of Christians who try to give the exact date on the day of the second coming of Jesus. Early example of this trend is Montanism movement in Asia Minor, in the second century. Montanus, with two of his female followers: Priscilla and Maximilla, stating that the Holy Spirit promised by Jesus has come in them. To assure this, they began to speak in tongues, even ecstasy. This movement demanded that his followers do the holy life, abstain from worldly pleasures, for Jesus' second coming is near.
In subsequent periods, groups emerged, which emphasizes Jesus' parousia to extremes, such as the Adventist group. The founder of this sect, namely William Miller predicted the second coming of Jesus will occur in 1843, after researching the Book of Daniel and Revelation. What happened was the disappointment of his followers because there is no any event in that year. Similarly, in groups of Pentecost, the tendency to match the events that occurred in the present with biblical prophecy about Jesus' parousia, as practiced by Gordon Lindsay. There are other groups similar, also do the same thing that is predicted the coming of Jesus' second coming, as recently happened.
Human efforts to calculate exactly when Jesus returns the second time, in any form will also end in failure, because contrary to the mandate of the Bible itself, αυτοι γαρ ακριβως οιδατε οτι η ημερα κυριου ως κλεπτης εν νυκτι ουτως ερχεται for you yourselves know very well that the Day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. (1 Thessalonians 5:2) περι δε της ημερας εκεινης και ωρας ουδεις οιδεν ουδε οι αγγελοι των ουρανων ουδε ο υιος ει μη ο πατηρ μονος "No one knows when that day or hour will come-not the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." (Mat 24:36)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)